Environmental zone Utrecht: Court postpones ruling in appeal KNAC

Appraisals mobile

The court in Utrecht postponed the ruling in the appeal of the KNAC versus the municipality of Utrecht about the lawfulness of the environmental zone. That statement was planned for today (October 29). According to the KNAC, the court stated that it needed more time to arrive at an assessment. It is not yet known when the ruling will be. The session took place on September 17. The KNAC had filed a lawsuit against the municipality because, among other things, there were serious doubts about the effects of the measure. Earlier this year, the KNAC was unsuccessful. An appeal was subsequently lodged.

Very limited measurement of air quality
The environmental zone - created to keep diesels from the years before 2001 from the inner city - rattles on all sides. There is inequality. It is not based on standard, but on the year of manufacture of the car. This leads to situations in which an efficient diesel is excluded from 2000, and a frequent consumer from 2002 is not, while meeting the same Euro standard. The environmental impact is also seriously questioned, as it has been shown in German cities that the zones in use had negligible effects. Incidentally, air quality measurement would be used to a limited extent in Utrecht. And that - together with the finding by Alderman Van Hooijdonk in which she indicates that there are hardly any more dirty diesels - is far too little to arrive at correct effect calculations. Also, as witnessed by the number of 7.000 fines, many banned diesels are still entering the city center of Utrecht. This largely invalidates Van Hooijdonk's claim. In fact, the environmental zone simply does not work.

The court does not yet make a decision in the case that the KNAC brought against the Utrecht environmental zone. There are sufficient arguments in favor of the KNAC. Photo: Erik van Putten
The court does not yet make a decision in the appeal that the KNAC brought against the Utrecht environmental zone. There are sufficient arguments in favor of the KNAC. Photo: Erik van Putten

Lack of communication does not lead to an end to the influx of old Diesels
This is partly due to the unfamiliarity with regard to the environmental zone as a result of poor communication and unclear signs still leads to a high supply of old diesels in the city center, mainly from outside Utrecht. The sad thing is that the environmental zone can also be technically circumvented. Because side roads can be used to bypass cameras or simply no cameras are installed at all. The residents of Utrecht now know that.

Technically approved, tax inequality
It all remains curious. Cars from before 2001 that pass the soot measurement at the MOT test are fined when they enter the environmental zone. The streets and roads within the environmental zone may also be driven by "permitted" vehicles. There is also an inequality principle that has already been mentioned. Because for both the well and unauthorized diesel cars, MRB is paid - apart from a few exemptions.

Procrastination plays into the hands of KNAC and affected motorists
In short, there is still much uncertainty and distress. The court also seems to be far from convinced of the usefulness and necessity of the environmental zone. It plays into the hands of the KNAC and the victims. And as long as no actual effects are visible on air quality, the municipality of Utrecht has no arguments in favor of maintaining the environmental zone. Not even after 1,4 million Euro tax money was spent without blinking eyes for an unsubstantiated measure. And not even after the court ruled in favor of the municipality of Utrecht and Milieudefensie. The local environmental party that got out of hand shows exactly why environmental zones don't work. And this problem must not be addressed locally, but nationally. The zones should be replaced by car-free inner cities that are only accessible to residents and local traffic. With a traffic circulation system for all other traffic. It works great in Leeuwarden and Groningen. That combination is simply the best solution. Not even for environmental reasons. But mainly out of proportion.

Holiday content banner


Give a reaction
  1. Due to the set limits, it could happen that you are not allowed to enter the environmental zone with a petrol car from before the summer of 1992, but with a technically identical car after the summer you are. The same goes for 2001 diesel cars, I thought. So you see that those who institute such a measure want to score politically with something they know the balls about. Anyway, that's what happened with the HSL and the Fyra.

  2. I hope the KNAC wins
    The state has introduced a MOT law that has determined the soot emissions from diesel cars. I think this law is above that of the borrowed state. Municipalities will now set their own rules and do not respect what the government has established. If this continues, municipalities can draw up their own rules for all kinds of matters that the government has already introduced into laws
    This is a form of arbitrariness.

Give an answer

The email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

The maximum upload file size: 8 MB. you can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

Now in store

View the 40-page preview via or a click on the cover.

The December issue, containing:

  • restoration report Fiat 1900B Granluce
  • restoration report Renault 5 Alpine Turbo
  • Austin 3 Liter
  • De Golf Convertible and the Creme21 Youngtimer Rallye
  • restoration report Hoffmann Governor MP 250-2
  • Kawasaki GTR 1000
  • Fisherman's Ambulance Museum
  • Duplicate type designations Part XX
cover 12 2022 300

The perfect reading material for an evening or more of undisturbed dreaming. It is now in stores. A subscription is of course better, because then you will no longer miss a number and you are also much cheaper. Not bad in these expensive times.

An R60 / 6 is also desirable

Now that the season has come to an end, it may also be a good time to point out the unique sponsorship concept of the Westfield Driver Association. Namely, 'lottery tickets' are sold for € 500 each. In addition to the listing on all cars in the banner, each ticket also takes part in the lottery. The first meeting of the new season draws and the winner of the lottery may call himself title sponsor of the cup. In the past season it was ANAC Car Wash. In addition, the shield sponsor and event sponsors are drawn. Perhaps this is also an interesting option for AMK. The AMK Westfield Cup ... sounds nice. In addition, € 500 is also a reasonable amount. Incidentally, there is a temporary offer, for € 1000 the sponsor does not get two but three participations, so three chances.

Westfields are okay. Yet?