Closing date July issue -> May 19
“Japs don't steer” – column
That was once a "science" of every pub tiger whose Triumph or Ducati was broken. But in fact it was just an urban legend. Because a fresh Japanese with a good pilot was a formidable weapon in the fight against the faltering but established order. The fact that the Japanese motorcycles just remained intact? That was no cause for grumbling, but resulted in the growth of customers. More and more customers.
In the XNUMXs and XNUMXs, motorcyclists usually drove fast. And because motorcycles did not yet have a dozen electronic systems that made the motorcycle determine what actually happened. Ho! The bike did determine what happened: If you exceeded its limits, it went wrong. But generally things went pretty well.
So why the bad reputation at the bar?
That was because there was indeed a field of tension between what the Japanese technicians could make in terms of engine blocks, while the bicycle technical development department was somewhat behind. And the standard bearers of that story? That became the Yamaha XS1 and the Kawasaki 500 cc three-cylinder, which even got the pet name 'widowmaker'. But maybe that wasn't ignorance, but a misjudgment. Because when developing modern, heavy and fast motorcycles, the Japanese had not thought at all about those strange, like loose sand hanging together countries on the mainland of Europe, let alone England.
There was only one part of the world that the Japanese had focused on
The USA of America. And there are very different laws than in Europe. Firstly, what we now call 'America' for the sake of convenience is a country where many almost endless roads are interspersed with gentle curves. In addition, a fairly solid policy was pursued with regard to top speeds. The speeding fines flowed right into the local sheriff's coffers, making them a serious business model. Americans and speed? That was to blast away as hard as possible at a traffic light up to the maximum permitted speed. An approach that did not impose phenomenal demands on bicycle parts.
At the time, Europe was virtually limitless when it came to permissible speeds
There were real highways. And there were a lot of winding roads. On the highways, the new Japanese powerhouses were invincible. The bottom fell out of the story in the fast corners, and that was because the Japanese were usually too soft and damped. And as they got older, it often turned out that the bearings of headsets and chain stays were rather susceptible to wear. The supply market bravely responded by offering conical steering head bearings and bronze bushings that could replace the plastic ones of the rear forks. With that, the sting was taken out of the road holding story for normal to quite sporty use.
And in the meantime, all kinds of very fast drivers such as Cees Cornwall had already convincingly proven on the national and foreign circuits that they could do very fast laps on such a fat Jap.
Which is not to say that the frames of the early XSen and the three-cylinder Kawasaki two-strokes were good. Because in addition to far above average driving skills, the pilots of that time also had to have big hearts and an ironclad belief that everything would turn out well. Because what we see in the archive photo? We would never have started that.

The Japanese bicycles were given the Zwarte Piet, but which '60 and '70 bicycle did NOT steer like a mop..?
In the mid-70s, major steps were taken in frame development or improvement.
The speeds became higher, and the braking also had to be at a higher level.
Mutual rivalry has always been there, the aversion to the eastern machines that were actually just better than what the west had to offer also belongs in that list.
Don't we petrolheads look at electric motors in the same way?
Egg
Yes, you name a few. The Kawa was rather light on the front wheel due to the explosive 2-stroke character, Yamaha had also copied more of a torque beast than the frame, not really…. At the time, Honda often built pressed sheet steel frames, not the epitome of razor-sharp, while the 750/4 had quite a heavy block. But with the tubular frames and civilized tamed blocks (eg GT750 with CV carbs) things got better and better.
With an XS1 frame, it is very easy to live with some adjustments (frame, steering head, rear fork bearings, radial tires) 😉
Even road racing is fine!
That kawasaki 500. What an acquaintance of mine said about that then, that's a firecracker. And more or less controllable.
That kawasaki 500. What an acquaintance of mine said about that then, that's a firecracker. And more or less controllable.
Frame construction..
My '1000 Z77 had a frame that bore a striking resemblance to cooked spaghetti.
I usually knew where the front wheel was, but where the rear wheel was usually a kind of rough educated guess with a high gambling content.
You did learn to steer, by the way, and to anticipate.
Decades later, when I rode a Suzuki 2 cylinder touring, I bravely dove into the corners waiting for the frame below me to groan and grumble that I was getting pretty close to the limit..
In contrast to that grumbling, all kinds of iron started scraping and sparks against the asphalt.
But move?
Frame building had clearly progressed a lot…
But the fun I had with that Z1000…….
In main steps in reminder:
– Japs copied
– Japs matched
– Japs excelled
That's about the rough overall picture.
The Japs did (and do) not break down quickly. A brand rightly gets its hands together for this.
Yet I also remember the beginning of the Honda Goldwing where, if it was ridden firmly, the frame turned out to be a kind of 'elastic intention', so that sturdy sliders happened. The nickname that circulated as a result was Honda 'Goldweil'. I also remember, from the times I've driven a CB750 from the early 70s, that the brakes weren't the most snappy. This was even a recurring theme in the wonderful 'Joe Bar' comics. But what comparison do I have if I have never ridden an English bicycle of the same years 🙄😬